Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 24% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-7100T - 157 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $35.17 vs $336.89
- Up to 87% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900K - $0.31 vs $2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.38/FPS
13%
Price, €
€373.95
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €373.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |