Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-6100 - 163 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $62.15 vs $358.27
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900K - $0.54 vs $2.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.44/FPS
22.13114754098361%
Price, €
€397.68
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €397.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55044 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
77.91411042944786%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
40.147948890383326%
Multi-Core
2336
11.594202898550725%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |