Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-2100 - 263 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $35.83 vs $336.89
- Up to 88% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900K - $0.17 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
11%
Price, €
€373.95
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €373.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
229
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |