Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 33% better in Remnant II than Celeron G3930T - 105 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $28.52 vs $339.01
- Up to 89% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-13900K - $0.4 vs $3.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €376.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
79
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |