Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3585 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 77% better in Rust than Celeron G1620 - 269 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €397.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
13.75252185608608%
Multi-Core
723
3.588445503275759%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |