Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-9900KF - 153 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $196.68 vs $318.06
- Up to 30% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900F - $1.61 vs $2.31 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
69%
Price, €
€353.05
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
136
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€218.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €218.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |