Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4069 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3960X - 260 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $211.46 vs $318.06
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900F - $1.01 vs $1.36 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
74%
Price, €
€353.05
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
232
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€234.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €234.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |