Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600K - 158 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $95.05 vs $314.41
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €348.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for €105.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1712
62.71062271062271%
Multi-Core
6468
37.56315697775713%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |