Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-9600K - 249 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $100.17 vs $318.06
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-13900F - $0.57 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
40%
Price, €
€353.05
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
196
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€111.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €111.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |