Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-9400 - 208 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $46.45 vs $318.06
- Up to 82% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900F - $0.3 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
174
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |