Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-4670 - 299 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $43.86 vs $307.06
- Up to 83% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-13900F - $0.19 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
299
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
16.666666666666668%
Price, €
€340.84
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €340.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
259
86.62207357859532%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
42.93040293040293%
Multi-Core
3228
18.746733259771183%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |