Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-10600K - 276 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $99.79 vs $307.06
- Up to 63% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-13900F - $0.45 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
36.58536585365854%
Price, €
€340.84
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €340.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
88.40579710144928%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1658
60.73260073260073%
Multi-Core
6838
39.711946106045644%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |