Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Remnant II than Celeron G4900 - 102 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $49.74 vs $318.06
- Up to 80% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-13900F - $0.69 vs $3.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.46/FPS
19%
Price, €
€353.05
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
80
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |