Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3170 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 128% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1840 - 551 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
551
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€340.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €340.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |