Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 218 vs 202 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $171.83 vs $307.09
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €340.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
202
92.66055045871559%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€190.73
100%
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
43.00366300366301%
Multi-Core
6976
40.51338637551542%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |