Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 7 2700X - 152 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $145.5 vs $318.06
- Up to 46% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-13900F - $1.25 vs $2.32 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.32/FPS
53%
Price, €
€353.05
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
129
84%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |