Buy on Amazon
€409.86
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3869 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3470 - 136 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $50.43 vs $369.24
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i9-13900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for €409.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75668 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3470 Quad-Core Processor 3.2 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53470
Buy for €55.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
22.91820191599116%
Multi-Core
1840
11.20175331791063%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.