Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3930T - 186 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $28.52 vs $356.98
- Up to 90% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900 - $0.22 vs $2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €396.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
145
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |