Buy on Amazon
€440.5
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 348% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6100 - 94 vs 21 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $21.68 vs $396.85
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-13900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for €440.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
for AMD CPU FX Series FX-6100 Six Core CPU 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ Processor
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.