Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 705 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 36% better in Starfield than Core i5-10400F - 80 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - $72.93 vs $255.18
- Up to 61% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-12900KS - $1.37 vs $3.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.54/FPS
38.70056497175142%
Price, €
€283.25
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €283.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44118 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
73.75%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
53.417533432392275%
Multi-Core
5751
35.44967022129076%
Intel Core i9-12900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |