Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 862 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 131 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $255.18 vs $782.37
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 150 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 48 vs 24 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €283.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74950 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
112
85.49618320610686%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€868.43
32%
Buy for €868.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74951 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1667
61.92421991084696%
Multi-Core
13317
82.08716020464773%
Intel Core i9-12900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |