Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-5675C - 203 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $65.81 vs $199.61
- Up to 61% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900KF - $0.42 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
38%
Price, €
€221.57
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €221.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1725 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
173
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |