Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2734 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Core i5-4460 - 162 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $40.22 vs $199.6
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-12900KF - $0.3 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
21%
Price, €
€221.56
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €221.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
149
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |