Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1361 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 2200G - 203 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $95.05 vs $216.3
- Up to 46% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900KF - $0.64 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
54%
Price, €
€240.09
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €240.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
164
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |