Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3868 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 27% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1240 - 151 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€435.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €435.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 80 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |