Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2125 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2125 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3714 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-2125 - 474 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2125 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2125
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $111.14 vs $392.64
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-12900K - $0.33 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
474
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
35%
Price, €
€435.83
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €435.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6479 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
371
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6478 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Core i3-2125 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |