Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Rocket League than Celeron G3930T - 786 vs 677 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $28.52 vs $241.25
- Up to 85% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-12900K - $0.05 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
786
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
14%
Price, €
€267.79
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €267.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
677
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |