Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 3950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 710 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 3950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 3950X - 130 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 3950X - $3.35 vs $3.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $361.95 vs $392.64
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 32 vs 24 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€435.83
92%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €435.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10055 minutes ago
Buy for €401.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10055 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |