Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-980X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-980X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 4312 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-980X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 69% better in Starfield than Core i7-980X - 76 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-980X - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-980X - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-980X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-980X
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $64.2 vs $334.88
- Up to 68% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-12900 - $1.58 vs $4.89 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €371.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 873 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
FPS
45
59%
Value, €/FPS
€1.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 873 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Core i7-980X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Gulftown |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |