Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2700K - 201 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $64.33 vs $301.2
- Up to 72% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900 - $0.46 vs $1.66 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
27.710843373493976%
Price, €
€334.33
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €334.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
156
77.61194029850746%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
26.849979781641732%
Multi-Core
2264
17.356639067770622%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |