Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1356 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 2600X - 276 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $61.7 vs $301.22
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900 - $0.29 vs $1.21 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
23.966942148760328%
Price, €
€334.35
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €334.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
234
84.78260869565217%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
50.02021835826931%
Multi-Core
5263
40.34805274455688%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |