Buy on Amazon
€188.3
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $513
Availability
MSRP in USD: $513
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 132 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $43.79 vs $169.64
- Up to 69% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900KF - $0.44 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-11900KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
30%
Price, €
€188.3
25%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for €188.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.61
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for €48.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-11900KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.