Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $185.71 vs $318.06
- Up to 38% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900F - $0.3 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900K - 732 vs 683 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
683
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €206.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
732
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
62%
Price, €
€353.05
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |