Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2085 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Deathloop than Core i7-6700 - 192 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $94.32 vs $193.77
- Up to 47% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-11900K - $0.59 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
52%
Price, €
€215.08
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €215.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10459 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
176
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €104.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |