Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 54% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-7500T - 500 vs 324 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $46.56 vs $185.71
- Up to 61% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900K - $0.16 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
500
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
39%
Price, €
€206.14
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
324
64%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |