Buy on Amazon
€223.19
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $539
Availability
MSRP in USD: $539
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 150 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $27.05 vs $201.07
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W
Buy for €223.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-11900K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
17.96710248840152%
Multi-Core
739
6.750091340884181%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.