Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - 192 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $153.55 vs $164.51
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - $0.89 vs $1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 20 vs 16 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12343 minutes ago
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |