Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-870 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-870 - 204 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-870 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $73.12 vs $153.55
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900F - $0.48 vs $0.84 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
57%
Price, €
€170.44
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |