Buy on Amazon
€170.44
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700 - 194 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $122.11 vs $153.55
- Up to 11% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - $0.78 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
88%
Price, €
€170.44
79%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.54
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W
Buy for €135.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.