Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4770 - 121 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $47.53 vs $153.55
- Up to 64% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-11900F - $0.51 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
36%
Price, €
€170.44
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
103
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |