Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Halo Infinite than Core i3-7100T - 169 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $35.17 vs $153.55
- Up to 75% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-11900F - $0.25 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
24%
Price, €
€170.44
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |