Buy on Amazon
€170.44
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F and the cheaper Core i3-10105 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10105 - 377 vs 351 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $65.77 vs $153.55
- Up to 53% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-11900F - $0.21 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
377
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
46%
Price, €
€170.44
42%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
351
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.01
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for €73.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.