Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 204 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $153.55 vs $197.42
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.84 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
69%
Price, €
€219.14
77%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |