Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G4400 - 130 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $19.74 vs $204.9
- Up to 89% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900 - $0.19 vs $1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €227.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
113
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €21.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |