Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Core i9-10900F - 794 vs 736 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $164.51 vs $197.42
- Up to 11% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-11900 - $0.25 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 20 vs 16 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
794
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
89%
Price, €
€219.14
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4770 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
736
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |