Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-10400F - 235 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $76.77 vs $190.07
- Up to 54% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-11900 - $0.41 vs $0.9 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
45.55555555555555%
Price, €
€210.98
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
88.93617021276596%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €85.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
67.51173708920187%
Multi-Core
5751
65.23366606170599%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |