Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 13% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G3930T - 213 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $28.52 vs $197.42
- Up to 83% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i9-11900 - $0.17 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
16%
Price, €
€219.14
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15435 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
189
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15435 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |