Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 108% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-6350 - 152 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $73.12 vs $197.41
- Up to 23% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-11900 - $1.11 vs $1.44 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
77%
Price, €
€219.13
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |