Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 2330 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i5-4670 - 153 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $102.01 vs $778.72
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10980XE - $0.76 vs $5.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 84 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.65/FPS
13%
Price, €
€864.38
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €864.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
149
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |