Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 2148 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1820 - 153 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $28.95 vs $566.68
- Up to 95% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10980XE - $0.22 vs $4.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.11/FPS
5.35279805352798%
Price, €
€629.01
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €629.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2455 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
145
94.77124183006535%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2450 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |