Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 356 vs 344 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $162.14 vs $570.32
- Up to 71% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10940X - $0.52 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10940X - 32 vs 28 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
356
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
29%
Price, €
€633.06
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €633.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16864 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16865 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |